However it is important that we do not allow workers to be exposed to an unknown danger where effects may not be known for years, even decades. These risks were highlighted in a report from the UK's Royal Society which said 'nanotechnology offers many potential benefits, but its development must be guided by appropriate safety assessments and regulation to minimise any possible risks to people and the environment.
The team of experts assessing the likely impacts of the emerging technology expressed concerns that when nanomaterials escape into the environment they will damage people and wildlife - but that it will be years before the effects are seen. Past generations have brought into general usage materials such as asbestos, leaded petrol, CFCs and cigarettes without adequately considering the potential damage and the commission fears nanomaterials will prove similarly dangerous.
- Eastern Sentiments (Weatherhead Books on Asia Series)?
- Little is known about the risks.
- Poverty Targeting in Asia!
The international insurance company, Swiss Re issued warnings at least fifteen years ago that the uncertainty about the risks that nanotechnology and nano-pollution pose means that they currently will not offer insurance to the industry. There has been very little attention paid to nanotechnology in Australia.
Unions made a number of submissions to a Senate inquiry into Workplace Exposure to Toxic Dusts that raised the emerging issue of nanotechnology in Australia. Employers should take a precautionary approach and ensure that workers are not exposed to nanoparticles.
For unions that means seeking to ensure that the production and use of nanoparticles is done within a contained process so that employees are not exposed to any potential unknown risk. Nanomaterials should be treated just like any other serious health risk. It is important that unions act now to ensure that we do not have a re-run of the asbestos tragedy where hundreds of thousands of people were exposed to a killer dust that even today kills many thousands of people a year. The declaration identifies eight fundamental principles for the effective oversight and assessment of nanotechnology, including mandatory government regulation.
It can be downloaded at the top right hand side of this page. In June of , the European Trade Union Confederation ETUC adopted its first resolution on nanotechnology and nanomaterials: that the precautionary principle must apply. The resolution states: 'nanometre forms of chemicals should not be allowed on the market unless sufficient data are supplied to show no harmful effect for human health and the environment. Other measures called for by ETUC include training and health surveillance for workers exposed to nanomaterials, at least 15 per cent of public research budgets on nanotech to be dedicated to health and environmental aspects and for workplace health and safety to be included in all research programmes.
Statement and Resolution. Download the Policy here. The taskforce did work in the following areas:.
Nanotechnology Environmental Health and Safety
This will include input from nanotechnology scientific expertise to ensure the scope of the review is relevant and covers current technologies;. The Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education now 'houses' the Enabling Technologies area, and has a website with information on government initiatives on nanotechnology.
It concludes that '[t]he occupational health and safety effects of engineered nanoscale particles are mostly unknown,' while acknowledging however, that 'findings from animal and in vitro test systems have provided some valuable information and these results indicate that human and environmental health consequences are possible from nanoparticle use and exposure. The report recommended addressing the 'greatest gaps in our current knowledge' as a matter of priority, namely:.
There is still no specific nano regulation. Some of the points in the paper:. Current OHS risk management processes do not readily apply because of the different structures and behaviours of nanoparticles. There is a crucial gap because OHS regulations focus on the chemical composition rather than the size or surface area, such as is the case with nanoparticles. The Australian Government Approach to the Responsible Management of Nanotechnology [ pdf ]: identified objectives to guide government agencies, including regulators and policy makers in their decision making process and policy development for nanotechnology.
The independent report, A review of possible impacts of nanotechnology on Australia's regulatory framework [ pdf ]: commissioned by the Australian Office of Nanotechnology to assess the adequacy of nanotechnology regulation and produced by the Centre for Regulatory Studies at Monash University. It concluded that there were a number of regulatory 'triggers' that is 'gaps' that needed to be addressed.
NOTE: in , many of these gaps had not yet been fixed. In April , a large group of Non-government organisations, including unions and Not for Profit organisations, raised concerns with government regarding the information being produced by various departments on nanotechnology.
The groups believed that much of the information was biased - understating the potential problems with the legislation, and overstating the potential benefits. After much discussion and delay, an independent review of the material and a number of events was undertaken. While the review was completed in , the findings of of the review were not released by government until the end of The review concluded: 'Australian government public information on nanotechnology has had a bias in favour of promoting the technology.
- Nanomaterial | Umweltbundesamt.
- Nanotechnology and the environment - Hazard potentials and risks.
- 3rd Edition.
The reviewers, Toss Gascoigne from the Australian Science Communicators, and Dr Karen Cronin from the Asia-Pacific Science and Technology Studies Network, said, 'Some of the items make only brief reference to scientific research and public concerns about potential health and environment risks. There is little in the materials about ethical, cultural or privacy issues. This report updates and builds on the findings of the report Engineered nanomaterials — a review of the toxicology and health hazards and provides specific information about the health hazards of:.
It provides suggestions for workplace exposure standards for carbon nanotubes and nanoscale silver and titanium dioxide. It also finds that conventional risk assessment approaches for chemicals can be used in managing risks of working with engineered nanomaterials. Nanotechnologies are expected to make a major contribution to improving the quality of the life of European citizens, in particular in sectors such as material sciences, health care, information technology, and the environment.
The European Commission has a Nanotechnology information site.
Impact of nanotechnology - Wikipedia
Nanotechnology - further reading and references. There is an ever-increasing body of information out there as more research is being done in the area of nanotechnology. In addition to the references on the Hazard page, check out other sources of information on nanotechnology Optional email code. Asbestos - in the workplace. Asbestos - in the home. Asbestos Management Review.
National Asbestos Summit 2: September National Asbestos Summit: June Dust in the Air in s Victoria. Latrobe Valley Report Asthma - what is it? Asthma Action Plan for Reps. Legal Standards for Asthma.
Asthma - sources of information. Biological Hazards. Biological Agents. Crippled by damp classroom. Bullying and Violence. Bullying - what is it? Bullying - how much of a problem is it? Bullying - Legal Standards. Bullying - Action plan for reps. Inquiry into workplace bullying. Bullying: More info. Violence at Work. Violence: More information. Violence - Ambulance Officers' Union Guidance.
Working alone — is it legal, is it safe? Call Centres. Call Centres - the problems. Call Centres - monitoring. Call Centres - legal standards. Thanks in advance for your time. Skip to content.
Search for books, journals or webpages All Pages Books Journals. View on ScienceDirect. Editors: Matthew Hull Diana Bowman. Paperback ISBN: Imprint: Elsevier.
Environmental Risks of Nanotechnology
Published Date: 17th August Page Count: View all volumes in this series: Micro and Nano Technologies. For regional delivery times, please check When will I receive my book? Sorry, this product is currently out of stock. Flexible - Read on multiple operating systems and devices.
Easily read eBooks on smart phones, computers, or any eBook readers, including Kindle. When you read an eBook on VitalSource Bookshelf, enjoy such features as: Access online or offline, on mobile or desktop devices Bookmarks, highlights and notes sync across all your devices Smart study tools such as note sharing and subscription, review mode, and Microsoft OneNote integration Search and navigate content across your entire Bookshelf library Interactive notebook and read-aloud functionality Look up additional information online by highlighting a word or phrase.
Institutional Subscription. Free Shipping Free global shipping No minimum order. Nanoinformatics: data driven materials design for health and environmental needs Part III: Perspectives Cleaning products Part V: Prediction and Sustainability Reviews toxicological studies and industrial initiatives, supported by numerous case studies Covers new generation of nanoparticles and significantly expands on existing material from second edition Only edited volume to collect research on the regulatory and risk implications of a wide array of industrial, environmental and consumer nanomaterials.